Bad journalism or fast IT reaction?

In today’s issue (04.11.2009, p.22) of L’esssentiel, a free daily newspaper in Luxembourg, I read an article about the fictive city Argleton… A city that apparently only exists in cyberspace and could be found on Google Maps, somewhere close to Liverpool, UK, Europe.

The newspaper article proposes a number of “explanations” for such an error. I particularly like the one explaining that companies providing (paid) acces to their online map services voluntarily insert such errors to track illegal uses of their intellectual property. I wonder if that’s really true…

It even relates that somebody from the University of Ormskirk went to the real place to check whether Argleton existed or not. I’ve never heard of such a University, by the way… 🙂 Another thing I’ll have to verify!

I did, of course, immediately check on Google Maps whether this phantom city could really be found via the iPhone’s Google Maps app… And the result is: No! No results for such a query.

Now I’m wondering, whether this is an example of bad journalism (telling a faked story) or has Google (or the map provider behind) updated their maps so fast that I could no longer find this entry… Hard to know…

How could I try to find an answer to this question? Any ideas?

I suspect that other “errors” in this article, if their are any to be found, would seriously reduce its credibility…

Posted via email from the material mind

3 Feedbacks on “Bad journalism or fast IT reaction?”

  1. I work at Edge Hill University and I can assure you it really does exist – in fact it’s celebrating its 125th anniversary next year!

    I don’t believe Argleton is an example of a “trap” town. Trap streets do exist but they’re usually slight meanders of rivers or cul-de-sacks in the wrong place. Changing the name of a village is unlikely! It’s most likely that Google or Tele Atlas are scanning in data and the OCR got it wrong.

    Google haven’t yet corrected the error on my view. In fact, someone in my team noticed it 13 months ago and reported it at the time so they’re pretty slow to update!

  2. @Mike: Thanks for your help in solving this riddle… 🙂 So the press article was wrongly reporting that Argleton does not exist… and I did indeed find it, later, using Google Maps on my iPhone and on my Mac.

    The place indicated by Google Maps nevertheless seems to be just a field and not really a town. Can you please provide the exact geolocation coordinates for the *real* city? 🙂

Comments are closed.