Keep IT Simple!

Bob Reuter's Web

Learning to dance – episode 1

Nathalie & I have finally decided to take dance classes. I should mention that I had taken dance classes when I was about 17 (I’m not completely sure anymore) and I still know the different dances, to some extent. But we wanted to harmonize our “dancing-as-a-couple”, to bring our dancing skills to the same level… and so I’ve agreed to start with the beginners course… I remember that back when I was 17 I always had some difficulties to grasp the sequence of movements constituent of a certain dance, so I’m quite glad that I do already “know” (or rather my body knows) all the dances we will see during the classes.

Our first course was yesterday evening. I was quite nervous! Yes, I was! Probably because I’ve had these difficulties in the past with “new dances” and that I would not want to look foolish in front of all these strangers. After all, Nathalie “knows” that I’ve already taken dance classes up to the “advanced level”… and I tend to build up a blockade when I don’t “get the steps” and need some time to “reprogram” my feet, by observing others and to visualize the steps in my mind… and I need to concentrate on an expert then, and cannot stand to see somebody who is really doing it the wrong way…

We’ve started with the “valse lente” and then proceeded to the “Cha-Cha-Cha”. I have got to say that Nathalie seems to get the steps very easily and we’re starting to synchronize very well… That was very beautiful! Of course, it’s still very simple sequences of steps that they show us and that we then copy and reproduce without too much creativity. It’s a bit like painting letters in 1st grade. “Writing texts” will be a bit more difficult… Indeed it’s gonna be more like “co-writing”… and Nathalie tends to try to lead… We’ll have to see… 🙂

I’d like to share one last thought about this first dance course with you… Since I’ve somewhat automatized (not to an expert level, of course) the cha-cha-cha steps, it’s been quite difficult for me to re-de-compose the three steps and to execute them separately and as if they were not “glued together”. That’s an interesting phenomenon I think… Sequences of body movements can become so integrated and tied together that the mind executes them as if they were inseparable. That reminds me of the FIXED ACTION PATTERNS (FAP) of the ethologists, a term they use to describe sequences of motor actions in certain animals that, once activated, are executed as a whole and cannot be split up or used in a flexible and combinatorial way. Geese show such FAP in their “bringing-the-egg-back-to-the-nest” behaviors. To me, this meant some “conscious effort” to re-de-compose the three steps and to execute them in a new way (which is an “old” way in some sense). Happily, quite rapidly, Nathalie and I, when we were asked to train the steps in couples, started to fasten the 3 steps so that they again resembled what I was used to. I’ve experienced a similar thing with the “valse lente”… Normally, when you make a step, the foot you’ve just moved should be the one where all, or most, of your weight is on… So, normally, you can only move the other leg, since it’s the one that’s “free”… However, when I started to think about this and to “consciously” monitor and control what leg I was standing on, my movement became somewhat quirky and awkward… Sometimes I’ve probably better to let “your body do the thing”… However, once you’ve then got a “bad habit”, it will be quite difficult to de-construct it and some “conscious effort” will be needed to un-do it.

Posted via web from the material mind

2 July 2009 at 08:09 - Comments

My First Blog Post on Posterous.com

Bloggen kann sou einfach sinn, wei eng email schecken…

och mat bild dran… cool!

Posted via email from the material mind

2 July 2009 at 07:53 - Comments

Using simple online games as tools for research on learning processes

I think it would be great to explore the way kids think and act when confronted with simple online games of the "problem-solving" type, like Magic Pen. It should be relatively easy to study how they conceive the problems and their solutions by recording the ongoing activity on the computer screen as well as their verbal utterances, using Snapz Pro X for instance.

Posted via email from the material mind

2 July 2009 at 07:53 - Comments
bob at 08:01 on 2 July 2009
see this game for instance: http://www.miniclip.com/games/magic-pen/de/

Book memo: Biopsychologie computerbasierten Lernens

I should read this book:
Biopsychologie computerbasierten Lernens by Christoph Sczesny

It’s available at the EMACS library, as far as I understood…

Posted via email from the material mind

2 July 2009 at 07:53 - Comments
bob at 08:01 on 2 July 2009
reading this book should help me better define a potential research project around "the cognitive neuroscience of learning in ict…

CELDA 2008 – Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age

I should submit a paper with Gilbert at this conference:


IADIS International Conference
Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2008)
Freiburg, Germany
13 – 15 October 2008

We could use the media2 projects from our students as a use case of constructivism, student-centered learning and collaborative approaches.

Posted via web from the material mind

2 July 2009 at 07:53 - Comments

Scribd.com – document sharing community

Finally, I re-discovered www.scribd.com – It’s all about sharing your documents online with a huge community of authors from around the world.

And now they also included the possibility to simply send files via email to the platform. That’s very cool and easy to use, even for my bachelor students 🙂 I’ll have to check if it’s possible to have restricted access to documents by the user. This could be one way to produce papers with students and to publish them world-wide… much like youtube.com for videos and flickr.com for pictures.

To be explored…

Posted via email from the material mind

2 July 2009 at 07:53 - Comments

Slideshare.net: Sharing Presentations

http://www.slideshare.net/ is another great tool in line with youtube.com and flickr.com – but for sharing presentations. Some really great works can be found on this plateform. Again, the question whether documents can be made invisible for other users???

Posted via email from the material mind

2 July 2009 at 07:53 - Comments

Evaluation sheets

This seems to be a really interesting resource for designing a “student-satisfaction-feedback” instrument.

http://www.willatworklearning.com/2008/07/smile-sheets-th.html

Posted via email from the material mind

2 July 2009 at 07:53 - Comments

Lese-Rechtschreib-Schwierigkeiten bei der Luxemburger Bahn..?

 
Neulich, als ich mal wieder mit dem Zug nach Walferdange gefahren bin (By the way, an dem Tag ist auch Erik L. ausnahmsweise mit der Bahn gefahren!) war das Ziel der Reise des Zuges etwas verwirrend… Eigentlich sollte es WILTZ heissen… Die Tatsache, dass ein L fälschlicherweise durch ein K ersetzt wurde, zeigt uns, dass die Tafeln der Zugverbindungen per Computertastatur eingegeben werden… L und K sind nämlich Nachbarn auf der Computertastatur und daher leicht vertauschbar… Es zeigt auch, dass die Städte (Dörfer) sind als Gesamtwort im System abgespeichert sind, sondern aus einzelnen Buchstaben zusammengesetzt werden… ausser dieser "Fehler" WILTZ als WIKTZ anzuschlagen würde sich wiederholend zeigen… Das würde dann nämlich darauf hinweisen, dass es eine direkte Adressierung der Wörter im System gibt und der Fehler sich zu Anfang eingeschlichen hätte… Ich glaube aber mich zu errinneren, dass ich auch schon mal WILTZ richtig geschrieben auf den Anzeigen gelesen habe… 🙂 Aber zumindest habe ich jetzt eine relativ genaue Voraussage machen können über zu beobachtende empirische Daten… anhand eines theoretischen Models, welches recht gut zu erklären scheint, wie die Abfahrttafeln an den Bahnsteigen "gefüttert" werden… Interessant wäre jetzt zu wissen, ob die Anzeigen am Bahnsteig direkt abhängig sind von der grossen zentralen Anzeige im Bahnhofsinnengebäude oder ob diese einzeln gespeist werden. Falls beide Arten von Anzeigen von einander abhängig sind, müsste sich der selbe Fehler überall zeigen, andernfalls darf man sich zumindest die Frage stellen, weshalb es zwei verschiedene Systeme gibt; und welche historischen Prozesse hinter diesem 2-gliedrigen System stecken. Insgesamt errinnert mich meine Überlegung zu einem solch banalen Rechtschreibfehler doch schon etwas an das Zwei-Wege Model (Dual Route Cascaded Model) von Colheart et al. (1993) zum Schriftspracherwerb (siehe z.B. http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/lili/personen/gnottbusch/doc/Schriftspracherwerb_09.pdf).

Posted via email from the material mind

2 July 2009 at 07:52 - Comments

Lustig, lustig, Ziegler oder Ziegler…?

Lustig, lustig… als ich jetzt kürzlich eine kleine Internetrecherche zum Thema “Dekodierung der schriftlichen Information” und nach Colheart gesucht habe, habe ich gesehen, dass Coltheart mit einem oder einer gewissen Ziegler zusammen publiziert hat… Da wir ja alle an der uni.lu wissen, dass die Frau Dr. G. Ziegler im Bereich SPRACHE geforscht hat, war ich da mal gespannt zu wissen, ob sie diese Person sei oder nicht… Es hätte mich eigentlich sehr gewundert, wenn sie es gewesen wäre… da mir Colthearts Model vom Lesen doch etwas entfernt von Gudruns Ansichten über Sprache erscheint… aber, wer weiss… gesagt, getan… kurze Internetrecherche zu Coltheart und Ziegler… und zack! es ist ein Herr Ziegler, er heisst Johannes Ziegler… und arbeitet an der Universität de Provence… hier seine Webseite: http://www.univ-provence.fr/gsite/document.php?pagendx=2741&project=lpc

Posted via email from the material mind

2 July 2009 at 07:52 - Comments